Some history
- First FSC General Assembly © FSC
In the wake of the UN Conference on Sustainable Development in 1992
(Rio Summit), concerned business representatives, social groups and environmental organizations got together and established the Forest Stewardship Council. Its purpose is to improve forest management worldwide.
What began in as not much more than an innovative idea has turned into the leading model for environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial and economically viable forest stewardship. Today, FSC is the only internationally recognized standard setting organization for responsible forest management supported by the corporate sector as well as environmental organizations and social groups.
This is how it all began:
1990 | First meeting of a group of timber users, traders and representatives of environmental and human-rights organizations in California, USA. This varied group of people had in common that all had identified the need for a system that could credibly identify well-managed forests as source of responsibly produced forest products. At this meeting it was agreed that this system would be based on a global consensus of what good forest management means. The name "Forest Stewardship Council (FSC)" was already coined at this meeting. |
1990-1993 | Intensive consultation processes in ten countries find support for a worldwide certification and accreditation system covering all forest types independent of ownership or geographic location and including natural forests as well as plantations. |
1992 | March Washington D.C., USA. Interim FSC Board of Directors established. |
1993 | First FSC certificates issued (forest management certificate in Mexico, chain of custody certificate in the USA). October FSC Founding Assembly in Toronto, Canada. 130 participants from 26 countries attend. First FSC Board of Directors elected. |
1994 | April First FSC Executive Director appointed - Mr. Tim Synnott. Summer The office of the FSC Secretariat opened in Oaxaca, Mexico with only three staff. Founding members approve FSC Principles and Criteria, together with the FSC Statutes (today called By-Laws). The FSC is now officially born. |
1996 | February FSC is established as a legal entity in Mexico. First four Accreditation Contracts signed for Forest Management certification. First certified and labeled FSC product available in the UK (wooden spatula). FSC Board of Directors endorses first FSC Working Group (UK). Principle 10 for plantations ratified by the FSC membership. June First FSC General Assembly in Oaxaca, Mexico. |
1997 | January First FSC National Standard endorsed (Sweden). Group certification for forest management introduced. |
1998 | First Non-Timber Forest Product working group meeting (Brazil). Mid 10 million hectares certified to FSC standards. November First FSC Annual Conference. |
1999 | June Second FSC General Assembly in Oaxaca. First FSC certified and labeled NTFP product - Chicle gum (Mexico). First complete book printed on FSC-certified paper: "A Living Wage" by Lawrence B. Glickman. End Tenth certification body accredited. The new Millennium brings rapid expansion and recognition |
2000 | Global Certified Trade Fair in London, UK. More than 1000 participants from 52 countries. November Second FSC Annual Conference. |
2001 | Beginning Second FSC Executive Director appointed - Mr. Maharaj Muthoo. Summer Third FSC Executive Director appointed - Mr. Heiko Liedeker. December FSC receives the City of Göteborg International Environmental Prize. |
2002 | Spring Policies on Group Certification of chain of custody, and sampling for multi-site organizations developed. Board of Directors decision to establish the FSC International Center in Bonn, Germany. |
2003 | FSC establishes FSC Regional Office in Africa. 20 000 FSC certified products on the market. |
2004 | First FSC Trade Fair showing exclusively FSC products in Brazil. FSC 10-year anniversary. First FSC Global Paper Forum. FSC Russia Regional Office opens. FSC SLIMF Standards come into force after two years of development. The FSC ‘Small and Low Intensity Management Forest’ Initiative has developed these streamlined standards to further equitable access of FSC certification also with small-scale, community-based, low-intensity pr non-timber product operations. The SLIMF Standards are one outcome of the FSC Social Strategy. |
2005 | January FSC opens Russia national office. |
2006 | March FSC creates Accreditation Services International GmbH (ASI) to manage the FSC accreditation program. |
2007 | January Third FSC Global Paper Forum in Frankfurt, Germany, alongside ‘Paperworld’, a major international trade fair on paper and paper products. The successful turnout is an indication of the rapid growth of the FSC paper market. October FSC created FSC Global Development to strengthen FSC markets and trademarks. |
2008 | February FSC Papua New Guinea approved by FSC - first Working Group approved in Oceania. March FSC Poland (Working Group) approved by FSC. April More than 100 million hectares certified to FSC's Principles and Criteria, distributed over 79 countries. Successful attendance to FSC Brazil Trade Fair 2008, Sao Paulo, Brazil. May FSC Senegal (Contact Person) approved by FSC. June Fourth FSC Executive Director appointed - Mr. Andre de Freitas takes office as FSC IC Executive Director and Acting Executive Director for FSC A.C. FSC Global Paper Forum in Dusseldorf, Germany, alongside ‘Drupa08’, a major international trade fair on paper and paper products. November Fifth FSC General Assembly in Cape Town, South Africa. Some 300 FSC members attend. December FSC Nepal (Contact Person), FSC Norway (Working Group) and FSC Honduras (Working Group) approved by FSC. |
A frequently asked question related to the FSC history:
-
Why was FSC created?
-
FSC certification is widely regarded as one of the most important initiatives of the last decade to promote responsible forest management worldwide. Why is this and what prior efforts have been made?
Concerns and large-scale public debates about the state of world’s forests escalated globally in the 1980’s and led to a gridlock between different stakeholders fighting about environmental, social and economic interests. Initiatives from governments and international organizations did not manage to reduce forest destruction worldwide and the need to substantially improve forest management practices persisted.
In the late 1980’s, tropical timber boycotts proclaiming to save the last tropical forests, not only failed, but worse, caused opposite effects in many cases. Conversion of forests to more economical land uses continued and in some cases accelerated.
The clear need for an effective mechanism to improve forest management and conservation worldwide was further emphasized in 1992 at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro. The World Summit in Rio de Janeiro agreed that progress towards sustainable development is the shared responsibility of social, environmental and economic interests although no legally binding commitments were agreed.
Disillusioned by the continuous failure of international negotiations progressive forest industries, social groups and environmental organizations came together to develop an alternative solution. Rather than boycotting poor practices, they wanted to use market forces to promote socially beneficial, environmentally appropriate and economically viable forest management.
For the first time, leading social, environmental and economic players from the Global South and Global North joined in an international process with equal and equitable voices, decision-making powers and responsibilities and founded FSC. To this day, FSC provides a platform for these different interest groups to work together in a dynamic environment where each interest group has a voice and an equal say.
Since its inception countless stakeholders around the world have worked with the FSC in its equitable participatory processes in support of responsible forest management. However, also since its early days, FSC was often criticized by conservative industries which did not believe in sharing decision-making with social and environmental stakeholders. Much like conservative industries, some environmental stakeholders believe that confrontational campaigns are a more appropriate conservation tool than equitable participatory solutions-oriented approaches. FSC will continue to try to engage conservative industries as well as confrontational NGOs in its approach.
FSC believes that it is part of the solution for the conservation of natural forests and that a full set of different complementary conservation strategies are necessary to protect and maintain the world’s forests.Category: History, Top 10 Questions about FSC
